• E About
  • I Architecture
  • I Art
  • qLife
    • Architecture Selection for Tumblr
    • Landscape
    • News
    • Tags
    • Architecture Selection for Tumblr
    • Landscape
    • News
    • Tags
  • I Contact/Links
  • G Feed
  • F

CAFAM Granny Squared by Yarn Bombing Los Angeles
Yarn Bombing Los Angeles (YBLA) is behind an epic yarn bombing that covers the facade of the the Craft and Folk Art Museum (CAFAM) on Wilshire Blvd in Los Angeles, California.
ZoomInfo
CAFAM Granny Squared by Yarn Bombing Los Angeles
Yarn Bombing Los Angeles (YBLA) is behind an epic yarn bombing that covers the facade of the the Craft and Folk Art Museum (CAFAM) on Wilshire Blvd in Los Angeles, California.
ZoomInfo

CAFAM Granny Squared by Yarn Bombing Los Angeles

Yarn Bombing Los Angeles (YBLA) is behind an epic yarn bombing that covers the facade of the the Craft and Folk Art Museum (CAFAM) on Wilshire Blvd in Los Angeles, California.

Source : mymodernmet

6Architecture Editor, Yarn Bombing Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 4 jours
Y Comments
p78 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
“Architectones at CSH 21” by Xavier Veilhan
Los Angeles Intervention performance at the Case Study House n°21 designed by Pierre Koenig, on Sunday 12th August 2012.
Photo © Joshua White
ZoomInfo
“Architectones at CSH 21” by Xavier Veilhan
Los Angeles Intervention performance at the Case Study House n°21 designed by Pierre Koenig, on Sunday 12th August 2012.
Photo © Joshua White
ZoomInfo
“Architectones at CSH 21” by Xavier Veilhan
Los Angeles Intervention performance at the Case Study House n°21 designed by Pierre Koenig, on Sunday 12th August 2012.
Photo © Joshua White
ZoomInfo
“Architectones at CSH 21” by Xavier Veilhan
Los Angeles Intervention performance at the Case Study House n°21 designed by Pierre Koenig, on Sunday 12th August 2012.
Photo © Joshua White
ZoomInfo
“Architectones at CSH 21” by Xavier Veilhan
Los Angeles Intervention performance at the Case Study House n°21 designed by Pierre Koenig, on Sunday 12th August 2012.
Photo © Joshua White
ZoomInfo

“Architectones at CSH 21” by Xavier Veilhan

Los Angeles Intervention performance at the Case Study House n°21 designed by Pierre Koenig, on Sunday 12th August 2012.

Photo © Joshua White

Source : veilhan.net

6Xavier Veilhan, Art, Design, Architecture, Pierre Koenig, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 1 mois
Y Comments
p178 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
A sculpture by Xavier Veilhan, part of the “Architectones” exhibition at the Sheats Goldstein Residence in Los Angeles
Picture: Brad Elterman for Purple
Zoom

A sculpture by Xavier Veilhan, part of the “Architectones” exhibition at the Sheats Goldstein Residence in Los Angeles

Picture: Brad Elterman for Purple

Source : purple.fr

6Xavier Veilhan, Brad Elterman, Art, Sculpture, Design, Landscape, Black and White, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 1 mois
Y Comments
p58 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
Pereira and Luckman, LAX original Plan, 1952
An original plan for LAX had a glass dome covering the entire airport. Apparently, there was also talk of building it on an island off of Santa Monica.
Photo: Courtesy LAWA Flight Path Learning Center
Zoom

Pereira and Luckman, LAX original Plan, 1952

An original plan for LAX had a glass dome covering the entire airport. Apparently, there was also talk of building it on an island off of Santa Monica.

Photo: Courtesy LAWA Flight Path Learning Center

Source : Gizmodo

6LAWA Flight Path Learning Center, LAWA, Pereira and Luckman, Architecture, LAX, Illustration, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p111 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
hollyhock house, frank lloyd wright, los angeles, california
Zoom

hollyhock house, frank lloyd wright, los angeles, california

Source : phdonohue

6Architecture Editor, Phil Donohue, Frank Lloyd Wright, Hollyhock House, Los Angeles, California, USA, Architecture,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p230 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
Los Angeles at Night from a 747 by Kurt Iswarienko
Zoom

Los Angeles at Night from a 747 by Kurt Iswarienko

Source : kurtiswarienko.com

6Kurt Iswarienko, Cityscape, Landscape, Black and White, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p277 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
some things.
first off: pacific standard time presents modern architecture in l.a is up and running and certainly worth seeing, either in person or on the internetsmachine. here’s the link: pacificstandardtimepresents.org
secondly: i’m only including one picture in this update. see, i was sitting outside and i was looking across the canyon and i noticed these three houses on the opposite ridge.i see them everyday, but for some reason i was particularly struck by them today.as you can see, there’s: a 1970’s castle, a spaceship, and an odd boxy modern house painted pink.which is, all things considered, l.a architecture at it’s finest. or most random. or, subjectively, finest.oh, and did i mention that there’s a mountain in the background?and on the mountain you can find mountain lions and hikers and people riding horse’s in the middle of the city?and people still think l.a is a terrible place?a bizarre desert mountain beach suburban latino city filled with fantastically dysfunctional artists and musicians and writers?a weird sprawling city where people sit in their backyards with their dogs and go on hiking dates when they’re not at the farmers market?that sounds terrible? to whom, scrooge? dick cheney? pol pot?
oh, and people sometimes dismiss l.a for it’s sprawl, but as far as urban verbs are concerned isn’t ‘sprawl’ better than ‘sit’? 
l.a might be a byzantine petri dish, but at least the things in petri dishes move around and do weird and interesting things.
moby
Zoom

some things.

first off: pacific standard time presents modern architecture in l.a is up and running and certainly worth seeing, either in person or on the internetsmachine. here’s the link: pacificstandardtimepresents.org

secondly: i’m only including one picture in this update. 
see, i was sitting outside and i was looking across the canyon and i noticed these three houses on the opposite ridge.
i see them everyday, but for some reason i was particularly struck by them today.
as you can see, there’s: a 1970’s castle, a spaceship, and an odd boxy modern house painted pink.
which is, all things considered, l.a architecture at it’s finest. or most random. or, subjectively, finest.
oh, and did i mention that there’s a mountain in the background?
and on the mountain you can find mountain lions and hikers and people riding horse’s in the middle of the city?
and people still think l.a is a terrible place?
a bizarre desert mountain beach suburban latino city filled with fantastically dysfunctional artists and musicians and writers?
a weird sprawling city where people sit in their backyards with their dogs and go on hiking dates when they’re not at the farmers market?
that sounds terrible? to whom, scrooge? dick cheney? pol pot?

oh, and people sometimes dismiss l.a for it’s sprawl, but as far as urban verbs are concerned isn’t ‘sprawl’ better than ‘sit’? 

l.a might be a byzantine petri dish, but at least the things in petri dishes move around and do weird and interesting things.

moby

Source : mobylosangelesarchitecture

6Architecture Editor, Moby, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p133 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
Lunch View from Johnny Rockets DTLA
iPhone4  |  VSCOCAM
ZoomInfo
Camera
iPhone 4
ISO
80
Aperture
f/2,8
Exposure
1/1676th
Focal Length
3mm

Lunch View from Johnny Rockets DTLA

iPhone4  |  VSCOCAM

Source : pouriolee

6Architecture Editor, Pourio Lee, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p106 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
Albert C. Martin & Associates, 1971
Zoom

Los Angeles County Department of Public Works

Albert C. Martin & Associates, 1971

Source : n-architektur

6Architecture Editor, Albert C. Martin & Associates, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p569 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo
ok, graffiti.
i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?
well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.
i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.
so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.
i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.
moby
ZoomInfo

ok, graffiti.

i mean, technically it’s attached to a building, so it’s tangentially architecture? right?

well, maybe i just have too broad an idea of what constitutes architecture, as i’ve included pictures of clouds and lizards on this site. but i’m a college drop-out, so what do you expect? an erudite and reasoned consideration of exceptional buildings? or pictures of lizards and graffiti? how about an erudite and reasoned consideration of lizards and graffiti? and buildings, too, on occasion.

i also have a really hard time spelling words with double consonants. like: ‘occasion’.  is that right? it looks like it should have 2 ‘s’s’.

so: graffiti. you have to admit, this graffiti is pretty remarkable. and it defines and establishes the space, far more than the building upon which it’s been painted. the building itself is kind of egregiously unremarkable. it’s only the graffiti that distinguishes the building from the few million other generic buildings in l.a.

i especially like the scary blue baby doll playing bongos. and the scary clown.

moby

Source : mobylosangelesarchitecture

6Architecture Editor, Moby, Street Art, Graffiti, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p407 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
see, l.a is a random city.  or, rather, a city of randomness.  and random things.  and a twisted unicorn spaghetti approach to cohesion. and because l.a is random i believe it would be odd to make any attempt to either shoe-horn or force any notions of cohesion onto it. even if involving dangling participles. like the last sentence.  sorry.
now, this building.  house.  bunker. it’s a random house in a random setting.  it’s modern and kind of brutalist and boxy.  it’s also grey, with dark windows. all well and good, but it presents a whole host of questions.
like, for instance, who wants to build a grey modernist box house on a desert hillside underneath blue skies and eucalyptus trees? i’m not saying it’s a bad choice, it’s just not necessarily the first choice many people would necessarily make when confronted with a building lot on a hillside surrounded by azure skies and eucalyptus trees.
i actually like this grey box house.  it’s simple and austere and utilitarian and it makes very little sense in it’s site/context, but it makes perfect contextual sense in a sprawling urban environment that’s fantastically devoid of cohesion.
i mean, a house like this could’ve been anything.  it could’ve been a beige hairball (as in: coughed up by a predator).  or it could’ve been a norman castle or a spanish hacienda or a mies inspired rectilinear glass box or a lautner spaceship.
it could’ve been anything.  and it’s a grey assemblage of boxes and dark windows.  which is great, i guess. baffling when scrutinized, but great.  cohesion is for sissies.
maybe that’s a new slogan for los angeles. along with: ‘los angeles, the first city of the apocalypse.’
ok, thanks.
moby
p.s-i’m also including a picture of a giant cross with downtown in the background.  it has nothing to do with this house.  except that they’re in the same neighborhood.  ok, thanks again.
ZoomInfo
see, l.a is a random city.  or, rather, a city of randomness.  and random things.  and a twisted unicorn spaghetti approach to cohesion. and because l.a is random i believe it would be odd to make any attempt to either shoe-horn or force any notions of cohesion onto it. even if involving dangling participles. like the last sentence.  sorry.
now, this building.  house.  bunker. it’s a random house in a random setting.  it’s modern and kind of brutalist and boxy.  it’s also grey, with dark windows. all well and good, but it presents a whole host of questions.
like, for instance, who wants to build a grey modernist box house on a desert hillside underneath blue skies and eucalyptus trees? i’m not saying it’s a bad choice, it’s just not necessarily the first choice many people would necessarily make when confronted with a building lot on a hillside surrounded by azure skies and eucalyptus trees.
i actually like this grey box house.  it’s simple and austere and utilitarian and it makes very little sense in it’s site/context, but it makes perfect contextual sense in a sprawling urban environment that’s fantastically devoid of cohesion.
i mean, a house like this could’ve been anything.  it could’ve been a beige hairball (as in: coughed up by a predator).  or it could’ve been a norman castle or a spanish hacienda or a mies inspired rectilinear glass box or a lautner spaceship.
it could’ve been anything.  and it’s a grey assemblage of boxes and dark windows.  which is great, i guess. baffling when scrutinized, but great.  cohesion is for sissies.
maybe that’s a new slogan for los angeles. along with: ‘los angeles, the first city of the apocalypse.’
ok, thanks.
moby
p.s-i’m also including a picture of a giant cross with downtown in the background.  it has nothing to do with this house.  except that they’re in the same neighborhood.  ok, thanks again.
ZoomInfo
see, l.a is a random city.  or, rather, a city of randomness.  and random things.  and a twisted unicorn spaghetti approach to cohesion. and because l.a is random i believe it would be odd to make any attempt to either shoe-horn or force any notions of cohesion onto it. even if involving dangling participles. like the last sentence.  sorry.
now, this building.  house.  bunker. it’s a random house in a random setting.  it’s modern and kind of brutalist and boxy.  it’s also grey, with dark windows. all well and good, but it presents a whole host of questions.
like, for instance, who wants to build a grey modernist box house on a desert hillside underneath blue skies and eucalyptus trees? i’m not saying it’s a bad choice, it’s just not necessarily the first choice many people would necessarily make when confronted with a building lot on a hillside surrounded by azure skies and eucalyptus trees.
i actually like this grey box house.  it’s simple and austere and utilitarian and it makes very little sense in it’s site/context, but it makes perfect contextual sense in a sprawling urban environment that’s fantastically devoid of cohesion.
i mean, a house like this could’ve been anything.  it could’ve been a beige hairball (as in: coughed up by a predator).  or it could’ve been a norman castle or a spanish hacienda or a mies inspired rectilinear glass box or a lautner spaceship.
it could’ve been anything.  and it’s a grey assemblage of boxes and dark windows.  which is great, i guess. baffling when scrutinized, but great.  cohesion is for sissies.
maybe that’s a new slogan for los angeles. along with: ‘los angeles, the first city of the apocalypse.’
ok, thanks.
moby
p.s-i’m also including a picture of a giant cross with downtown in the background.  it has nothing to do with this house.  except that they’re in the same neighborhood.  ok, thanks again.
ZoomInfo
see, l.a is a random city.  or, rather, a city of randomness.  and random things.  and a twisted unicorn spaghetti approach to cohesion. and because l.a is random i believe it would be odd to make any attempt to either shoe-horn or force any notions of cohesion onto it. even if involving dangling participles. like the last sentence.  sorry.
now, this building.  house.  bunker. it’s a random house in a random setting.  it’s modern and kind of brutalist and boxy.  it’s also grey, with dark windows. all well and good, but it presents a whole host of questions.
like, for instance, who wants to build a grey modernist box house on a desert hillside underneath blue skies and eucalyptus trees? i’m not saying it’s a bad choice, it’s just not necessarily the first choice many people would necessarily make when confronted with a building lot on a hillside surrounded by azure skies and eucalyptus trees.
i actually like this grey box house.  it’s simple and austere and utilitarian and it makes very little sense in it’s site/context, but it makes perfect contextual sense in a sprawling urban environment that’s fantastically devoid of cohesion.
i mean, a house like this could’ve been anything.  it could’ve been a beige hairball (as in: coughed up by a predator).  or it could’ve been a norman castle or a spanish hacienda or a mies inspired rectilinear glass box or a lautner spaceship.
it could’ve been anything.  and it’s a grey assemblage of boxes and dark windows.  which is great, i guess. baffling when scrutinized, but great.  cohesion is for sissies.
maybe that’s a new slogan for los angeles. along with: ‘los angeles, the first city of the apocalypse.’
ok, thanks.
moby
p.s-i’m also including a picture of a giant cross with downtown in the background.  it has nothing to do with this house.  except that they’re in the same neighborhood.  ok, thanks again.
ZoomInfo
see, l.a is a random city.  or, rather, a city of randomness.  and random things.  and a twisted unicorn spaghetti approach to cohesion. and because l.a is random i believe it would be odd to make any attempt to either shoe-horn or force any notions of cohesion onto it. even if involving dangling participles. like the last sentence.  sorry.
now, this building.  house.  bunker. it’s a random house in a random setting.  it’s modern and kind of brutalist and boxy.  it’s also grey, with dark windows. all well and good, but it presents a whole host of questions.
like, for instance, who wants to build a grey modernist box house on a desert hillside underneath blue skies and eucalyptus trees? i’m not saying it’s a bad choice, it’s just not necessarily the first choice many people would necessarily make when confronted with a building lot on a hillside surrounded by azure skies and eucalyptus trees.
i actually like this grey box house.  it’s simple and austere and utilitarian and it makes very little sense in it’s site/context, but it makes perfect contextual sense in a sprawling urban environment that’s fantastically devoid of cohesion.
i mean, a house like this could’ve been anything.  it could’ve been a beige hairball (as in: coughed up by a predator).  or it could’ve been a norman castle or a spanish hacienda or a mies inspired rectilinear glass box or a lautner spaceship.
it could’ve been anything.  and it’s a grey assemblage of boxes and dark windows.  which is great, i guess. baffling when scrutinized, but great.  cohesion is for sissies.
maybe that’s a new slogan for los angeles. along with: ‘los angeles, the first city of the apocalypse.’
ok, thanks.
moby
p.s-i’m also including a picture of a giant cross with downtown in the background.  it has nothing to do with this house.  except that they’re in the same neighborhood.  ok, thanks again.
ZoomInfo

see, l.a is a random city.  or, rather, a city of randomness.  and random things.  and a twisted unicorn spaghetti approach to cohesion. and because l.a is random i believe it would be odd to make any attempt to either shoe-horn or force any notions of cohesion onto it. even if involving dangling participles. like the last sentence.  sorry.

now, this building.  house.  bunker. it’s a random house in a random setting.  it’s modern and kind of brutalist and boxy.  it’s also grey, with dark windows. all well and good, but it presents a whole host of questions.

like, for instance, who wants to build a grey modernist box house on a desert hillside underneath blue skies and eucalyptus trees? i’m not saying it’s a bad choice, it’s just not necessarily the first choice many people would necessarily make when confronted with a building lot on a hillside surrounded by azure skies and eucalyptus trees.

i actually like this grey box house.  it’s simple and austere and utilitarian and it makes very little sense in it’s site/context, but it makes perfect contextual sense in a sprawling urban environment that’s fantastically devoid of cohesion.

i mean, a house like this could’ve been anything.  it could’ve been a beige hairball (as in: coughed up by a predator).  or it could’ve been a norman castle or a spanish hacienda or a mies inspired rectilinear glass box or a lautner spaceship.

it could’ve been anything.  and it’s a grey assemblage of boxes and dark windows.  which is great, i guess. baffling when scrutinized, but great.  cohesion is for sissies.

maybe that’s a new slogan for los angeles. along with: ‘los angeles, the first city of the apocalypse.’

ok, thanks.

moby

p.s-i’m also including a picture of a giant cross with downtown in the background.  it has nothing to do with this house.  except that they’re in the same neighborhood.  ok, thanks again.

Source : mobylosangelesarchitecture

6Architecture Editor, Moby, Brutalism, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p128 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
DOOWYLLOH by Austin Hargrave
Zoom

DOOWYLLOH by Austin Hargrave

Source : austinhargrave.com

6Austin Hargrave, Landscape, Cityscape, Black and White, Architecture, Hollywood Sign, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p105 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
Hover House 3
Architects: Glen Irani Architects
Location/Year: Venice, Los Angeles / 2009
Zoom

Hover House 3

Architects: Glen Irani Architects

Location/Year: Venice, Los Angeles / 2009

Source : glenirani.com

6Glen Irani Architects, Architecture, Design, Venice, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p196 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
Skyline Residence     
Architects: Belzberg Architects
Location/Year: Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles / 2007
Photograph: Benny Chan
ZoomInfo
Skyline Residence     
Architects: Belzberg Architects
Location/Year: Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles / 2007
Photograph: Benny Chan
ZoomInfo
Skyline Residence     
Architects: Belzberg Architects
Location/Year: Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles / 2007
Photograph: Benny Chan
ZoomInfo
Skyline Residence     
Architects: Belzberg Architects
Location/Year: Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles / 2007
Photograph: Benny Chan
ZoomInfo
Skyline Residence     
Architects: Belzberg Architects
Location/Year: Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles / 2007
Photograph: Benny Chan
ZoomInfo
Skyline Residence     
Architects: Belzberg Architects
Location/Year: Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles / 2007
Photograph: Benny Chan
ZoomInfo

Skyline Residence     

Architects: Belzberg Architects

Location/Year: Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles / 2007

Photograph: Benny Chan

Source : belzbergarchitects.com

6Belzberg Architects, Benny Chan, Architecture, Design, landscape, Hollywood Hills, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p288 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
Vintage postcard of Dodger Stadium designed by Praeger-Kavanaugh-Waterbury
Zoom

Vintage postcard of Dodger Stadium designed by Praeger-Kavanaugh-Waterbury

Source : delcampe.net

6Praeger-Kavanaugh-Waterbury, Architecture, Stadium, Dodger Stadium, Vintage, Postcard, Illustration, Los Angeles, California, USA,

s
Bil y a 2 mois
Y Comments
p50 Notes
rshare
A
0
SHORTLINK
tul
1 of 6
Older
-
Load more posts...